Recently RBI has come out with a new
circular on June,8, 2015 wherein it has elaborated in detail the modes operandi
of loan conversion into shares leading to management takeover . The scheme is
in continuation of its’ efforts in devising framework for Revitalising
Distressed Assets. The concept is based on the general principle of
restructuring i.e. Shareholders bear the first loss rather than the debt
holders.
This will enable the lenders to convert
the loan into equity and thereby management control from the promoters. The scheme has been named as Strategic Debt
Restructuring (SDR) scheme as it involves change in management temporarily or
permanent too. The scheme is based on the presumption that the existing
management is either not capable to revive the unit or does not intend to do
so. Also this will give more ammunition to the lenders to pressurize the
borrowers. This scheme can also be
applied to the cases where restructuring is done earlier and the MRA has
necessary clause to this effect. The circular gives in detail guidelines
towards conversion ratio and all related matters.
In my view, such draconian clauses needs
be studied properly. An entrepreneur who has already lost all the properties,
business and credibility is further pushed to corner. There may be some willful
defaulters but not all are willful. In business uncertainty is always there and
the entrepreneur services the obligation to the maximum possible. By threatening
to takeover, there is least probability of recovery, rather the fear in
borrower may further push the company to dust. Also the lender is not always at
fault for NPA, even lenders are also equally responsible for such disaster. In
most of the cases timely relief could have saved the borrowing unit from
slipping to NPA. Always the delay in support plays major role in such
situation. I also feel that the lenders should also be made equally responsible
and thorough investigation should be carried out into their role and actions.
Borrower should be given unbiased and patient hearing as he is the person who
has taken maximum risk by pledging every thing . The takeover of shareholding
and transferring to some New Promoter
at later stage may be part of some conspiracy . This may also lead towards new
kind of corruption. The scheme also mentions about the divestment to new
promoter and also refinancing the debt to new promoter. Such refinancing may
lead to some kind of conspiracy . Thus such scheme is not only impractical but
full of flaws.
CP Jain