Lot of views are
expressed on mounting NPAs in the country in last 3 years. We blame lenders for
their poor monitoring system or borrowers for their malpractices. Have we ever
thought where else can be a problem? Monitoring and investigations come at
later stage when the loan is already sanctioned and disbursed. In fact we can narrate
the whole process of financing as under:
a) submission of Loan proposal;
b) appraisal and sanction of loans;
c) disbursement of loans;
d) monitoring and evaluating the loans already given;
e) recovery of the loans along with interest;
f) investigations, settlement, restructuring, if not repaid in scheduled time; and
g) concluding the chapter or litigations.
b) appraisal and sanction of loans;
c) disbursement of loans;
d) monitoring and evaluating the loans already given;
e) recovery of the loans along with interest;
f) investigations, settlement, restructuring, if not repaid in scheduled time; and
g) concluding the chapter or litigations.
Generally we
discuss about the issue from monitoring onwards by which time, money is already
disbursed and lenders are left with no option but to submerge with the plans of
the borrower.
In fact, the most
crucial decision is to accept the proposal of the borrower and disburse the
same in planned way. Generally the proposal when submitted contains lot of
information, analysis and viability support. It mostly has rosy picture
prepared solely to impress the lenders to lend money and earn a lot with fully
secured module. There may be some hidden or unwritten agenda which also push to
lend money. The proposal travels to various layers and moves upward with strong
recommendations by each concerned authority at every level. It means every mid
size proposal pass through the hawk eyes of many experienced bankers. Not only
this it is also scanned by outside agencies like rating agencies, TEV studies,
marketing reports, government statistics etc. Then how come there is so much
jump in defaults.
Real fault lies with the appraisal system of the
proposal received for financing. Indian banks have age old system where each
application is submitted fitted with lot of ratio analysis and lending methods.
These formats are analysed by the people working on that who are also given
instructions verbally in most of the cases as to how it should be directed. This is where the cases are manipulated. Due diligence and analysis system in
our country is quite old. Except the up gradation in mode of presentation (from
typewriting to computerized), the core is not yet changed. The system of due
diligence and appraisal need lot of amendments mainly to sync with the economy,
macro and micro factors, government policies and the expertise of the borrower.
Current system is based on the security, reputation or net worth of the
promoter and general business trend. There is assumption that if something
going good for long it will remain as it is. No provision for the sudden
No comments:
Post a Comment